Coque iphone 6 alienwork Offer to License Patents to Samsung Didn-coque samsung a50 amour-ymivcp

Offer to License Patents to Samsung Didn

An Apple patent coque iphone 5s silicone avec anneau licensing executive said Monday coque iphone 6 plus ecriture that coque iphone 8 nantes the company offer to license its patents to Samsung included only certain patents and not ones related coque samsung s10 coque iphone 6s vw to the iPhone unique user interface.

A document entered into evidence on Friday showed Apple was willing to license certain patents for $30 per phone and coque iphone 7 olive $40 per tablet.

Apple Boris Teksler said Monday that the company wasn willing to license many of its user interface patents but coque iphone 7 plus livraison rapide was willing to license some of its patents.

were trying very hard to come up coque samsung s8 with an amicable resolution with Samsung, Teksler said. wanted them to respect and protect our unique user experience. general, Teksler said, coque iphone 5s avec verre trempé Apple doesn license coque huawei p20 its design patents to any other company.

Teksler noted that Apple and coque huawei p20 Microsoft have a cross license agreement that does cover the design patents at issue in this coque iphone 6s zizi case, but said that there are also special provisions in the agreement between those two companies.

couldn’t copy each other’s products, Teksler said.

Once both sides finished their examination of Teksler, who began testifying on Friday, Apple played videotaped depositions from JunWon Lee, a Samsung patent licensing official; Dong Hoon Chang, head of Samsung mobile design group; and Timothy Benner, an analytics executive for Samsung Telecommunications America.

The next live witness, Terry Musika, is an accountant who offered his estimate of what Samsung would owe Apple meilleures coque iphone 7 if the jury finds Apple patents are both valid and infringed.

Musika testified that, again if found to be infringing, Samsung would owe between $2.5 coque iphone 7 banksy billion and $2.7 billion in damages. Musika acknowledged that a very large damage figure, but noted that Samsung has sold 22.7 million allegedly coque iphone 6 coussin d’air infringing smartphones and tablets, generating $8.16 coque iphone 5 s tracteur billion in revenue.

As part of his analysis, coque iphone 6/ 6s Musika noted that Samsung smartphone market share increased dramatically once it introduced the phones accused of coque iphone 6s pll infringing on Apple patents, citing IDC figures. Most of it at the moment is focused on the billion dollar difference between what Musika estimates as Samsung profit coque iphone 7 champion vs. what Samsung calculates as its coque huawei p8 profits on the devices accused of infringing.

Musika calculated damages in three different ways. For the bulk he used his estimate of Samsung profits, while for some phones he used a reasonable royalty rate and for still others he used a calculation of Apple lost coque iphone 6 plus jul profits on sales they would have gotten were it not for the alleged infringement. Samsung now making its motion that Apple has failed to prove infringement and that, as a matter of law, judge should rule in its favor.

Judge Koh opts not to review written briefs on this issue, so Samsung lawyers now reciting all of the ways in which they feel Apple has failed to meet its burden. Koh has said Samsung has five minutes to make its case…